Oooooooonnnnnneeeeeeeemmmmmmmmiiiiilllllllliiiiieeee
Is the process like this: 38+29=67, then 67-23=44
50-44=6
thus possibly A?
Detailed analysis:
The scenario mentions that a mouse covered a total of 3/24 miles over a span of 3 hours. The mouse traveled an identical distance during each hour. To find out how far the mouse went in one hour, we need to divide 3/24 miles by 3. Thus,

Matt's calculation indicates that the outcome is 3/8 hours. When he divides 3/24 by 3, he should take the reciprocal of 3, but he doesn't, resulting in 9 as the numerator and 24 as the denominator. The fraction 9/24 simplifies to 3/8. However, the accurate answer should have been 1/24 hours.
Only numbers that are composite factors and that, when increased by 1, divide evenly into 48 will work. Thus 15 is suitable. Fifteen is composite, and adding 1 to it gives a number that divides 48. Therefore the son is 15.
These experiments depend on Bernoulli's principle. If the likelihood of "success" is p and you are looking for k successes out of n attempts, the probability can be expressed as:

To simplify the calculation for the first probability, instead of determining the chances of at least one subject having breakfast, we calculate the opposite: that none do. Thus, we seek 0 successes from 4 trials with a success probability of 0.34. Using the formula gives us:

With the contrary outcome at 17%, the probability of our event "at least one of the surveyed eats breakfast" is 83%.
Regarding the second question, the event "at least three of the surveyed eat breakfast" encompasses the events of "exactly three eating breakfast" and "exactly four eating breakfast." So, we just need to add their probabilities:
