It is reasonable to state that one object has twice as much of the attribute property when it has a score of 60 and the other ob

Answer:

NPV = negative 37,599

Explanation:

To determine the NPV of the new sewing machine, we subtract the investment from the present value of anticipated cash inflows.

Initial investment = Cost of machine + Training expenses - Salvage value

Initial investment = 2,450,000 + 85,000 - 250,000

Initial investment = 2,285,000

Year                                      DF(9%)   Present Value

1  Cash inflow     390,000  x 0.917      $357,798

2 Cash inflow     400,000  x 0.842    $336,672

3 Cash inflow     411,000   x  0.772     $317,367

4 Cash inflow     426,000  x 0.708     $301,789

5 Cash inflow     334,100  x 0.650     $217,077       (434,100 - 100,000)

6 Cash inflow     435,000  x 0.596    $259,376

7 Cash inflow     436,000 x 0.547     $238,507

7 Salvage value 400,000 x 0.547     $218,814  

Present Value of cash inflow             $2,247,401

Initial investment                                $2,285,000

NPV ($2,247,401 - $2,285,000)          (37,599)    

Conclusion: Hillsong should refrain from acquiring the new machine since the NPV is negative.      

Response:

Year 1: Cumulative preferred stock dividends amount to $51,000; Common stock dividends amount to 0.

Year 2: Cumulative preferred stock dividends amount to $93,000; Common stock dividends amount to $12,000.

Year 3: Cumulative preferred stock dividends amount to $72,000; Common stock dividends equal $9,000.

Year 4: Cumulative preferred stock dividends amount to $72,000; Common stock dividends total $48,000.

Clarification:

Year 1

Total dividends distributed = $51,000

Cumulative preferred stock dividends due = 60,000 * $60 * 2% = $72,000

Paid dividends to cumulative preferred stock = $51,000

Outstanding cumulative preferred stock dividends carried over = $72,000 - $51,000 = $21,000

Common stock dividends = 0

Year 2

Total dividends distributed = $105,000

Cumulative preferred stock dividends due for year 2 = 60,000 * $60 * 2% = $72,000

Total cumulative preferred stock dividends owed = 72,000 plus the amount carried over from year 1 = $72,000 + $21,000 = $93,000

Dividends paid on cumulative preferred stock = $93,000

Dividends paid to common stock = $105,000 - $93,000 = $12,000

Year 3

Total dividends distributed = $81,000

Cumulative preferred stock dividends owed = 60,000 * $60 * 2% = $72,000

Dividends paid on cumulative preferred stock = $72,000

Dividends paid to common stock = $81,000 - $72,000 = $9,000

Year 4

Total dividends distributed = $120,000

Cumulative preferred stock dividends owed = 60,000 * $60 * 2% = $72,000

Dividends paid on cumulative preferred stock = $72,000

Dividends paid to common stock = $120,000 - $72,000 = $48,000

Question not complete

Direct Labour Cost is missing

Direct Labor Cost ----- $50,000.00 $270,000.00

Answer:

a.

Overhead Rate (Cutting Department) = $5.5 per machine hour = $5.5 per machine hour

Overhead Rate (Finishing Department) = $12.2 per labour hour

b. Total Manufacturing Cost = $644

c. Yes

Explanation:

a. To determine the predetermined overhead rate appropriate for each department.

Given

Cutting Department

The Cutting Department calculates its rate based on machine-hours

Manufacturing Overhead Costs = $264,000

Machine Hours = 48,000

Finishing Department

For the Finishing Department, the rate is calculated based on direct labor-hours.

Manufacturing Overhead Costs = $366,000

Direct Labour Cost = $270,000

Overhead Rate (Cutting Department) = Manufacturing Overhead Cost/Machine Hours

Overhead Rate (Cutting Department) = $264,000/48,000

Overhead Rate (Cutting Department) = $5.5 per machine hour

Overhead Rate (Finishing Department) = Manufacturing Overhead Cost/Machine Hours

Overhead Rate (Finishing Department) = $366,000/$270,000

Overhead Rate (Finishing Department) = 1.36

Overhead Rate (Finishing Department) = 136% direct labour cost

b.

The Cutting Department's rate is based on machine-hours

Given

Machine hours = 80 machine hours

Overhead Rate = $5.5 per machine hours ------ This was calculated

The Finishing Department's calculations rely on direct labor-hours.

Given

Direct Labour Cost = 150

Overhead Rate = 136% of labor cost ------ This was deduced

Overhead Applied (Cutting Department) = 80 * 5.5

Overhead Applied = 440

Overhead Applied (Finishing Department) = 136% * 150

Overhead Applied = $204

Total Overhead Applied = $440 + $204

Total = $644

c. Yes

If the business utilizes a company-wide overhead rate linked to direct labor cost and if jobs have increased machine hours paired with lower labor costs, they would incur less overhead expenses.