A fast-growing form of foreign direct investment is sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). Why do these investments by governments with

The gain amounts to $370

Reasoning:

To determine the gain or loss for the date 12/31/2018, according to ABC's amortization schedule

On this date, the carrying value was $196,370 while ABC procured the bonds back for $196,000 on 12/31/2018

Now let’s compute the gain or loss using this formula

Gain/Loss = Carrying value - Bond stock

Substituting into the formula gives us Gain/Loss =$196,370-$196,000

Gain/Loss=$370

Therefore, on the date 12/31/2018, ABC will show a gain of $370

Answer:

Total cost= $104,022.6

Explanation:

Given the following data:

The company anticipates $6000 in expenditure after 1 year, $9000 after 3 years, and $10,000 annually from year 6 through year 10.

The annual interest rate is set at 12%.

We will apply this formula:

FV= PV*(1+i)^n

FV= 6000*(1.12)^9= 16,638.47

FV= 9000*(1.12)^7= 19,896.13

Total= $36,534.6

For the last three amounts, we shall use the formula:

FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i

A= annual payment

FV= {10000*[(1.12^3)-1]}/0.12= 67,488

The cumulative cost is 67,488 + 36,534.6= $104,022.6

Answer:

The answer is Legal.

Explanation:

A legal issue comprises a conflict that needs to be resolved under the existing laws. When such matters are presented to a judge, there is typically a requirement for justification. This necessitates outlining the conflict using the normative and factual arguments presented by the parties involved, along with relevant consensus and/or evidence. Once the judge possesses all necessary normative and factual details, as well as their interpretation and evidentiary foundations, they can articulate the problem. This scenario contains two facets: the normative aspect refers to the overarching theme of the dispute, while the factual aspect details the specific elements of the case that provide a unique interpretative context to the general issue.