Answer:


Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1:-
We have c1(t) = e^ t i + (sin(t))j + t³k
and c2(t) = e^−t i + (cos(t))j − 6t³k.
By adding c1(t) and c2(t):
c1(t)+c2(t) = e^ t i + (sin(t))j + t³k + e^−t i + (cos(t))j − 6t³k
Now, employing the derivative formula:


Next, differentiate with respect to 't'

By factoring out i, j, and k terms, we arrive at:

Answer:
(C) They have the same coefficient of variation
Step-by-step explanation:
The coefficient of variation (CV) is calculated using the formula:

Where
represents standard deviation and
represents the mean.
Bob's average weight is 200 pounds with a standard deviation of 16 pounds
This indicates that
.
Thus, his coefficient of variation is

Mary's average weight is 125 pounds, with a standard deviation of 10 pounds.
This implies 
Therefore, her coefficient of variation is

Since both have the same coefficient of variation, the accurate response is.
(C) They have the same coefficient of variation
Quadratic equations find their application in various real-world scenarios such as: sports, bridges, projectile motion, the curvature of bananas, and so on.
Here are three images representing real-world instances of quadratics:
Example 1: A cyclist travels along a parabolic trajectory to leap over obstacles.
Example 2: A person throws a basketball towards the hoop, moving in a gently upward path described by a quadratic curve.
Example 3: A football player kicks the ball upward, which follows a quadratic path as it travels a distance.
Answer:
Angle x = angle 115°.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: We have two parallel lines intersected by a transversal.
To find: The value of x.
Solution: Since two parallel lines are intersected by a transversal, corresponding angles, which are a pair lying on the same side of the transversal—one being on the interior and the other on the exterior—are equal.
Thus, angle x = angle 115, being corresponding angles.
Therefore, angle x = angle 115.
Answer:
Robyn's model is logical, while Mark's is illogical.
Step-by-step explanation:
This question doesn't require calculations. What we need to do is analyze each model logically.
Mark's
Mark's representation indicates 20 instead of 2, which signifies that 200 is ten times greater than 20, making it nonsensical.
Robyn's
Robyn's representation displays 2, suggesting that 200 is 100 times greater than 2, which is not only accurate but also reasonable since 100 * 2 equals 200.