Canadian Tire is one of Canada’s largest companies, with 50,000 employees and 1,100 stores and gas bars (gas stations) across Ca

<span>When there are ongoing speculations regarding a company's financial troubles, it can lead to a decrease in employees' internal motivation.

The level of Maslow's hierarchy that corresponds to this scenario is the safety needs level.

</span><span>Safety needs in Maslow's framework pertain to the requirement for security and safeguarding.

This security encompasses the safety of life and belongings, as well as job stability, among other aspects.
</span>

Response:

Clarification:

Last year's customer orders totaled 15000

Predicted orders for next year with a 15% rise = 15000 x 1.15 = 17250

Each customer order takes 1.5 hours to fulfill

Total time needed to satisfy customer orders = 17250 x 1.5 = 25875

Knowing that the standard work year comprises 2000 hours

Hence, the effective work year with a 2% capacity cushion

= Standard work year x ( 1 – Capacity cushion %/100)

= 2000 x 0.98  = 1960 hours

Workers required by manager

= Total time needed for orders / effective work year

= 25875 / 1960  = 13.20, rounded to 13

Thus, the manager will require 13 workers next year

Here are the instructions outlined below. Given the details: 1 Pound T-bone: Selling price ($7.95 per pound) is $7.95; Joint costs amount to $3.80; Profit per pound therefore is $4.15. Further processing incurs a cost of $0.55 per T-bone steak, resulting in a 6-ounce filet mignon and one 8-ounce New York cut. The filet can be sold for $12.00 per pound, while the New York cut is priced at $8.80 per pound. A) Filet mignon earns $12.00 per pound, so for 6 ounces: 0.375 x 12 = $4.50. New York cut earns $8.80 per pound: 0.5 x 8.80 = $4.40. The total sales from both cuts amount to $8.90, while total costs consist of $3.80 + $0.55 = $4.35, leaving a profit of $4.55. B) Further processing the T-bone steak yields an extra $0.40 in profit.

Answer:

To begin with, we require a discount rate; in researching similar questions, I found that the discount rates ranged from 4% to 8%, so I opted for 6%.

The company has two options: continue operating in a competitive market or reduce its prices to eliminate competition.

Utilizing the perpetuity formula, the present value for the first option is calculated as follows: = $10,000,000 / 0.06 = $166,666,667

For the second option, the present value is:

PV of price reduction = $1,000,000,000 / 1.06 = $943,396,226 plus the present value of future net income

The present value of future net income = $50,000,000 / 0.06 = $833,333,333, but this figure must be discounted as the terminal value relates to the end of the current year, not now: $833,333,333 / 1.06 = $786,163,552

Consequently, the NPV associated with lowering prices is $786,163,552 - $943,396,226 = -$157,232,674, indicating this is certainly not a favorable plan.