Answer: California, New Mexico, and Texas
Response:
Affirmative action seeks to address the effects of social discrimination against minorities (such as African Americans, Hispanics, and LGBT individuals) by granting them advantages compared to the majority population. A notable example of this is the implementation of racial quotas at certain institutions like universities and federal offices.
In my view, while this approach functions as a quick fix for discrimination where it is implemented, I do not think it is a sustainable long-term solution. I believe that the roots of discrimination lie in inadequate education and lack of social awareness, which can only be resolved through improved understanding of equality—one of our nation's core principles.
To sum up, even though these measures may initially contribute to decreasing discrimination, there must be broader structural changes to effectively tackle this issue.
Answer:
When the Constitution was drafted, the thirteen states needed to endorse it for it to come into effect, as the US operates as a federal republic.
Explanation:
This was contentious because antifederalists believed a national government was excessively powerful.
The Articles of Confederation were initially intended to serve as our governing framework, but they rendered the government too feeble, so the Constitution replaced it despite ongoing opposition from the antifederalists.
Essentially, the question prompts you to choose between supporting the constitution and a federal system or opposing it as the antifederalists did.
Effectiveness of Gambling: It inspires hope that a person might win through their actions, with some individuals securing massive monetary rewards even though they are the minority, potentially enabling a transition from poverty to wealth.
Ineffectiveness: Many develop unrealistic expectations, leading to gambling addictions; rather than gaining wealth, individuals often waste money consistently.
Effectiveness of Informal Trading: Provides greater freedom to negotiate prices since sellers are not bound by strict rules, requires no extensive employee management, and offers flexibility to relocate since businesses rarely operate in government premises.
Ineffectiveness: Prices can fluctuate arbitrarily, and informal traders might more easily engage in dishonest practices to benefit their business.
Please consider marking my response as brainliest. Thank you!
Could it be the telegraph?
