In a team that follows agile, how would a team member know what others are working on? 1. The Product Owner and the Facilitator

Answer:

A. Nonprogrammed; reflective; programmed; reactive

Explanation:

Decisions that are programmed tend to happen more often and are executed swiftly, nearly automatically, without requiring extensive contemplation, thanks to what we refer to as the reactive system.

On the other hand, nonprogrammed decisions arise in unique or unfamiliar circumstances and necessitate more profound contemplation and comprehension of the matter at hand. These decisions are analyzed using the reflective system of the brain.

Thus, the accurate response is A. Nonprogrammed; reflective; programmed; reactive

Solution – Division A

Explanation:

Last year's data shows that Division A contributed 60% of total revenue.

Let total revenue for the company last year be x.

Therefore, Division A earned 0.6x.

Similarly, Division B generated 40% of total revenue last year.

This means Division B’s income was 0.4x.

For the current year, Division A’s earnings have dropped by 35%.

Since last year was 0.6x, the amount lost is 35% of 0.6x.

So this year’s revenue: 0.6x - 0.35(0.6x) = (1 - 0.35) * 0.6x = 0.65 * 0.6x = 0.39x.

Division B’s revenue declined by 5% this year.

Last year’s revenue was 0.4x, so this year it is 0.4x - 0.05(0.4x) = 0.95 * 0.4x = 0.38x.

Comparing both, Division A’s revenue (0.39x) exceeds Division B’s (0.38x) this year.

Answer:

Crash the schedule.

Explanation:

Using fast-tracking enables earlier completion of the task but incurs higher costs. Assigning seasoned individuals to the project will also increase management expenses. Reducing the project scope leads to a quicker finish by decreasing requirements. Hence, options A, B, and D are not viable solutions.

Opting to crash the schedule (option C) is the correct choice since it efficiently utilizes resources to accelerate task completion without additional expenditure.

Response:

13.33 years

Clarification:

The duration required for an investment to recover its original expenditure is known as the payback period. For projects yielding consistent cash inflows, the payback period can be calculated using the following formula:

Payback period = Initial investment/cash flows

Here, the initial investment equals $2,000,000.00

cash flow = extra sales per year plus savings on utilities

= $125,000 + $25,000 = $ 150,000

thus, the payback period = $ 2,000,000 / $ 150,000

= 13.33 years

Answer:

Due to increased sales, the company’s debt will decline by 187.5 dollars

Explanation:

total income of 2,250

dividends amounting to 900

payout ratio: 900/2,250 = 0.4

income projected to grow by 5%

2,250 multiplied by 1.05 equals 2,362.5‬

retained earnings for breakeven:

2,362.5 times ( 1 - 0.4) equals 1,417.5

asset increase:

24,600 multiplied by 0.05 equals 1,230

Now we apply this to the accounting equation:

Assets = liabilities + equity

+1,230 = liabilities + 1,417.5

thus, liabilities = -187.5