Answer:
15.18%
Explanation:
To calculate the nominal annual rate
The first step is to determine EFF% with this formula
EFF% = [1 + (Nominal rate percentage/Number of months in a year)]^Number of months in a year
Let's substitute into the formula
EFF% = [1 + (15%/12)]^12
EFF% = (1 + 0.0125)^12
EFF% = (1.0125)^12
EFF% = 1.1608 × 100%
EFF% = 116.08%
The second step is to find Rnom for quarterly compounding at 116.08% using this formula
Rnom compounding quarterly = (1 + (R/4))^4
Let's plug into the formula
Rnom compounding quarterly = (116.08%)^(1/4) Rnom compounding quarterly = 1 + R/4
Thus,
Rnom compounding quarterly = 15.18%
Therefore, Anne Lockwood should offer her customers a nominal rate of 15.18% compounded quarterly
To create a resume that is convincing while avoiding a self-centered tone, it is essential to refrain from using words like I, ME, and My
. Therefore, the answer is: D all of the above.
Answer:
A differentiated market
Explanation:
When a company creates products for at least two distinct categories or demographics, it follows a differentiated marketing approach.
For example, a retailer might promote items in multiple towns appealing to various individuals, or a business may market a brand tailored to women across different age groups.
Answer:
d. A higher level of risk corresponds to a smaller potential investment.
Explanation:
Regarding speculation, risk is defined by the variability of returns. The discrepancy between expected outcomes and actual results is referred to as risk. In this instance, Sandy believes there exists a positive relationship between the likelihood of risk and returns. For instance, if the risk is elevated, the chance of achieving returns rises. Conversely, reduced risk implies lower chances of earning returns.
Sandy prefers to assert that with elevated risk comes lesser investment possibilities, since the fluctuation of returns is substantial. This suggests that investors may aim for guaranteed returns rather than uncertain but potentially larger yields. In the realm of investments, it is a common question; some may agree that higher risk leads to lower maximum investments.
Thus, the answer is option D.
If a statement claims that greater risk leads to larger potential returns, it does not guarantee that the investor will indeed realize larger returns with their investments. The chances might be present for larger earnings, but obstacles also accompany such opportunities.
Result:
The result is $ 300
Reasoning:
When we subtract 1,500 from 1,200, the result is 250; however, the calculation of multiplying (1,500) by (.20) yields 300, which corresponds to similar pressure.
