Answer:
The triangulation technique may not always yield a precise result (aside from any errors in measurement) for the following reasons:
It employs a variety of data sources, different researchers, and multiple theories or viewpoints.
Step-by-step explanation:
Research triangulation integrates various methods, data sources, diverse investigators, and assorted theories to develop a deeper insight into the situations being studied. This process fortifies qualitative research by incorporating data from multiple sources, perspectives, and methodologies.
Using the Pythagorean theorem: In a right triangle where legs are labeled a and b, and hypotenuse is c. Given the triangle ΔXYZ has a right angle at Y, with angles YZX and ZXY both measuring 45 degrees, and ZY = YX = 12 cm. The task is to find the length of XZ.
Answer:
The total probability exceeds 100%, indicating a problem with the findings; moreover, the distribution shows excessive uniformity which disqualifies it as a normal distribution.
Detailed explanation:
The sum of probabilities should be exactly 100%. When you add the probabilities of this distribution:
22+24+21+26+28 = 46+21+26+28 = 67+26+28 = 93+28 = 121
This exceeds 100%, highlighting a significant error in the results.
A typical normal distribution possesses a bell curve. If we plot the probabilities for this distribution, we'd see bars at 22, 24, 21, 26, and 28.
The bars would fail to form a bell-shaped curve, confirming that this is not a normal distribution.
There is clear favoritism present. However, it is crucial to examine not just how many women were promoted in comparison to men but also the rate of promotion within each group. In the case of men, 21 out of 24 received promotions, indicating a substantial rate of 87.5%. In contrast, for women, only 14 out of 24 were promoted, which is 58.3%, just over half. Therefore, we can conclude that there is a distinct bias favoring male employees.
to achieve a minimum of 200 chocolate bars
c=chocolate bars
2.5c>or=500
Divide both sides by 2.5
c>or=200