Answer:
IRR = 14.96%
The project should be rejected, because the calculated internal rate of return falls short of the required return (14.96% < 16%).
Explanation:
The internal rate of return (IRR) is an essential calculation in capital budgeting for assessing potential investment profitability. The IRR rule guides whether to pursue a project or investment, stipulating that if the IRR exceeds the minimum required return, the project should be accepted. Conversely, if it’s lower than the cost of capital or the requisite return, the project should be turned down.
The formula used is as follows:
$0 = (initial investment x -1) + CF1 / (1 + IRR) ^ 1 + CF2 / (1 + IRR) ^ 2 +... + CFX / (1 + IRR) ^ X
Initial Investment = Total initial investment costs year x-1
CFx = Cash Flow during period X
IRR = Internal rate of return
Due to the nature of the IRR formula, it cannot be computed analytically; it must be derived through trial and error or via specialized software for IRR calculation.
In this instance:
IRR = -27200 + 11200 / (1 + IRR) ^ 1 + 14200 / (1 + IRR) ^ 2 + 10200 / (1 + IRR) ^ 3
IRR = 14.96%
The company should not proceed with the investment, as the calculated IRR is less than what is required (14.96% < 16%).
Answer:
c. Sparkling water, evening wine tasting, four-star hotel restaurant
a. You need to persuade your coworkers to embrace a new software program that they find confusing.
b. You need to let go of your receptionist.
c. You are dispatching a past-due notice on an account.
Explanation:
In the first question, sparkling water, evening wine tasting, and dining at a four-star restaurant are specific items that align with the examples of food and drink and $100/night four-star accommodations from the scratch list.
In the subsequent question, a manager applies indirect strategies when conveying uncomfortable news to staff in a manner that minimizes negative psychological effects. For instance, informing someone about the termination is distressing and should be relayed indirectly, beginning with an explanation and positioning the primary information at the end of the message
Opting for the lease is a more favorable choice. To illustrate, we examine the calculations for both options. First, we calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) for the Lease Option:
Year n Details CF ($) DF=1/(1.1)^n PV ($)
1 - Lease payment (30,000) 0.9091 (27,273)
2 - Lease payment (30,000) 0.8264 (24,793)
3 - Lease payment (30,000) 0.7513 (22,539)
4 - Lease payment (30,000) 0.6830 (20,490)
The NPV for the lease option equals (95,096).
For the Buy Option, we carry out the following calculations:
Year n Details CF ($) DF=1/(1.1)^n PV
0 Purchase cost (80,000) 1.0000 (80,000)
1 Maintenance costs (10,000) 0.9091 (9,091)
2 Maintenance costs (10,000) 0.8264 (8,264)
3 Maintenance costs (10,000) 0.7513 (7,513)
4 Maintenance costs (10,000) 0.6830 (6,830)
Residual value at end of year 4 20,000 0.6830 13,660
The NPV for the buy option results in (98,038).
To determine the equivalent annual annuity (EAA) for each option:
EAA = (r × NPV) / (1 - (1 + r)^-n)
where r is the discount rate per period and n shows the number of periods.
Calculating:
Lease option EAA = (0.1 × -95,096) / (1 - (1 + 0.1)^-4) = -30,000.
Buy option EAA = (0.1 × 98,038) / (1 - (1 + 0.1)^-4) = -30,928.
Since the lease option manifests a lower EAA of $30,000 compared to the buy option's $30,928, the lease is deemed the superior choice.
