Answer:
- As explained below, with the individual’s score in the 0.03125 fraction of top candidates, they can anticipate securing a position.
Explanation:
Utilizing Chebyshev’s Theorem is key.
This theorem is valid for any dataset, irrespective of its shape.
Chebyshev's Theorem states that at least 1−1/k² of the data falls within k standard deviations from the mean.
For this data set, the specifics are:
- mean: 60
- standard deviation: 6
- score: 84
The number of standard deviations that 84 is from the mean can be calculated as:
- k = (score - mean) / standard deviation
- k = (84 - 60) / 6 = 24 / 6 = 4
Hence, the individual’s score is 4 standard deviations above the mean.
How significant is this?
According to Chebyshev’s Theorem, at least 1−1/k² of the data is within k standard deviations from the mean. Setting k = 4 gives us:
- 1 - 1/4² = 1 - 1/16 = 0.9375
- This implies that half of 1 - 0.9375 exceed k = 4: 0.03125
- Consequently, 1 - 0.03125 is below k = 4: 0.96875
With 70 job openings and 1,000 applicants, the ratio is 70/1,000 = 0.07, indicating the company seeks the top 0.07 of applicants.
Given the individual scores in the top 0.03125 of applicants, they can expect to obtain a job.
Answer:
The true statements regarding the market are:
1) The cupcakes are priced below their equilibrium level. This is evident as excess demand exists, which wouldn't be the case at the equilibrium price.
3) Customers getting cupcakes are those who value them the most, seen through their willingness to queue before the bakery opens.
4) The bakery does not rely solely on price for distributing cupcakes. Timing plays a role; only those who arrive early get them.
Statements (2) and (4) are incorrect because those conditions only hold true at the equilibrium point.
No, this arrangement violates the AICPA Code of Conduct. The firm's fee is entirely contingent upon the success of their work, whereas the Code permits compensation based on effort but not solely on outcome. Since there is no guaranteed fee unless tax credits are awarded, this opens the door to potential misconduct by the firm. To prevent such risks, the Code disallows fees that depend exclusively on the achievement of tax credits.
Answer:
The present value of the cash flow, discounted at a 5% annual rate, is $76,815.65.
Explanation:
First, we calculate the present value of a $15,000 annuity over 4 years:
C 15,000.00
Time 4
Rate 0.05
PV $53,189.2576
Next, we discount two additional years as a lump sum, corresponding to two years following the investment:
Maturity 53,189.26
Time 2.00
Rate 0.05000
PV 48,244.2245
Adding them results in the present value:
48,244.22 + 28,571.43 = 76,815.65
A) For the first half of the year, the monthly demand averages to 560 / 6 = 93.33
Order size for the first six months can be calculated using: Sqrt(2 x A x O / C)
Where:
O is the cost of placing an order
C is the carrying cost per order
= Sqrt(2 x 93.33 x 55 / 2) = 71.65, rounded to 72
For the second half of the year, the monthly demand is 900 / 6 = 150
Order size for the second six months:
= Sqrt(2 x A x O / C)
= Sqrt(2 x 150 x 55 / 2)
= 90.83 or 91
B) For the first six months: Total monthly cost = (Q/2) x H + (d/Q) x S= (72 / 2) x 2 + (93.33 / 72) x 5 = $143.30 With a $10 discount, S = $ 55 - $10 = $ 45
Monthly TC at Q = 50 = (50/2) x 2 + (93.33 / 50)x 45 = $134.0 Monthly TC at Q = 100 = (100/2) x 2 + (93.33 / 100) x 45 = $142.00
Monthly TC at Q = 150 = (150/2) x 2 + (93.33 / 150) x 45 = $178.00
C)
Indeed, the manager should take advantage of this proposal and order Q = 50 units for the first six months. For the second six months, d = monthly demand = 900 / 6
= 150,
H = $2.00 for each unit monthly, S = $55, & EOQ = 91.
Calculating Monthly TC (Q = 91):
= (91/2) x 2 + (150/91) x 55
= $181.66
Monthly TC (Q = 50):= (50/2)x2 + (150/50)x 45= $185 Monthly TC (Q = 100) = (100/2) x 2 + (150/100) x 45= $167.50
Monthly TC (Q = 150)= (150/2) x 2 + (150/150) x 45= $195
