A bouncing ball reaches a height of 27 feet at its first peak, 18 feet at its second peak, and 12 feet at its third peak. Descri

Answer:

Ben could have sold a maximum of 6 turkey sandwiches.

Step-by-step explanation:

Turkey sandwiches are priced at $2.50, while veggie wraps cost $3.50 at the snack stand.

Our goal is to determine the largest number of turkey sandwiches Ben might have sold.

4 veggie wraps were sold (y).

Thus, the inequality is: 2.50x + 3.50(4) < 30

2.50x + 14 < 30

- 14 - 14

2.50x < 16

Ultimately, Ben could sell a maximum of 6 turkey sandwiches.

Answer:

a. 0.82%

b. 71.11%

c. 0.564 micrometer

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the z value for each measurement, we must calculate and determine the percentage they correspond to, and the difference will give us the percentage between those two statistics.

The equation for z is:

z = (x - m) / (sd)

Here, x is the value being evaluated, m denotes the mean, and sd represents the standard deviation.

a.

For 0.62 copies, we calculate:

z = (0.62 - 0.5) / (0.05)

z = 2.4

This translates to 0.9918.

Therefore, p (x > 0.62) = 1 - 0.9918

p (x > 0.62) =  0.0082 = 0.82%

b.

For 0.47 copies, we have:

z = (0.47 - 0.5) / (0.05)

z = -0.6, which equates to 0.2742.

For 0.63 copies:

z = (0.63 - 0.5) / (0.05)

z = -2.6, which yields 0.9953.

Hence, p (0.47 > x > 0.63) = 0.9953 - 0.2742

p (0.47 > x > 0.63) = 0.7211 = 72.11 %

c.

For x copies, we find:

p = 0.9 corresponds to z = 1.28.

Thus, 1.28 = (x - 0.5) / (0.05)

From which we derive:

x = 1.28*0.05 + 0.5

x = 0.564 micrometer

The result I found is 32.761%. Percentage represents any fraction expressed out of 100. It's calculated using the formula: If A is to be expressed as a percentage of B, the formula is A/B * 100. In this case, the paid price for the sweater is $36.20 and the original price is $90.50. We endeavor to find out what percentage reflects the sale price of the sweater. Mathematically, this can be framed as what is 36.20% of 90.5, which translates to (price paid/original price) * 100, and mathematically results in ($36.20/$90.50) * 100 = 32.761. Thus, this indicates that the sweater was sold for 32.761% off its original price.

They cannot possess the same number of horses; let me clarify. If you divide 21 horses among four individuals, you would perform 21/4, yielding 5.25, implying that fractional horses are unfeasible. Therefore, at least one individual must have 6 horses instead of 5. Possibly, this is what your instructor wants you to understand. For an even distribution, they could sell one horse, making it 20, so each would then have 5 horses. Alternatively, they might share the extra horse to rotate its usage.