answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luba_88
20 days ago
14

A manufacturing firm is considering two locations for a plant to produce a new product. The two locations have fixed and variabl

e costs as follows: Location FC (annual) VC (per unit) Atlanta $ 80,000 $ 20 Phoenix $ 140,000 $ 16 If the annual demand will be 20,000 units, what would be the cost advantage of the better location? HINT: Compare the total costs Select one: a. 40000 b. 20000 c. 460000 d. 60000
Business
1 answer:
soldi70 [3.6K]20 days ago
4 0
The cost advantage of different locations is $20,000. Phoenix appears to have a cost benefit over Atlanta and should be selected for the new facility instead of other options.
You might be interested in
"I am thinking about decentralizing, allowing employees lower in the organization to make more decisions. When does decentralizi
Nady [3600]

When managing a business that caters to various customers across different regions uniquely

In rapidly changing environmental conditions where employees need authority to make swift decisions

When larger-scale operations are more effectively performed

Explanation:

Generally, decentralizing authority within a company is advantageous in scenarios where there is a critical need for:

  1. prompt action from employees, as work environments and requirements adjust frequentlyconsistently, leaving little time for centralized directives.
  2. For operations distributed over extensive logistical areas, relying on a single central command is impractical.When a company aims to address a variety of areas with different personnel providing distinct services.
8 0
1 month ago
A recent project nominated for consideration at your company has a four-year cash flow of $20,000; $25,000; $30,000; and $50,000
harina [3808]

Answer:

1. $501.54

2. 1.01

3. -$5,728.56

Explanation:

The calculations are detailed below:

1. For determining the net present value

Year    Cash flow     Discount factor @20%         Present value  

0         $75,000         1                                               $75,000

1          $20,000        0.8333333333                          $16,666.67

2         $25,000        0.6944444444                       $17,361.11

3         $30,000        0.5787037037                       $17,361.11

4         $50,000        0.4822530864                       $24,112.65

The total of cash inflows is                                                   $75,501.54

NPV                                                                              $501.54                                      

The discount factor is to be calculated as follows:

= 1 ÷ (1 + rate) ^ years

2. The benefit-cost ratio is calculated by:

= Total Present Value ÷ Initial Investment

= $75,501.54 ÷ $75,000

= 1.01

3. For net present value as calculated

Year    Cash flow     Discount factor @20%         Present value  

0         $75,000         1                                               $75,000

1          $20,000        0.8064516129                     $16,129.03

2         $25,000        0.650364204                    $16,259.11

3         $30,000        0.5244872613                    $15,734.62

4         $50,000        0.4229735978                    $21,148.68

The sum of cash inflows is                                                 $69,271.44

NPV                                                                            -$5,728.56                                  

The discount factor is to be computed as stated:

= 1 ÷ (1 + rate) ^ years

7 0
1 month ago
Global use of cell phones grew rapidly between 1989 and 2000. below is a scatterplot of the percentage of people in the world wh
Scilla [3833]

Answer:

Explanation:

A)

The formula for regression is,

ln(Cell Phone Subscribers) = -820.894 + 0.411704 Year

or,

Percentage of Cell Phone Subscribers = exp(-820.894 + 0.411704 Year)

For the year 2005,

Percentage of Cell Phone Subscribers = exp(-820.894 + 0.411704 * 2005)

= 96.79%

B)

The significance of the slope has a p-value close to 0 (0.000). Hence, the model holds statistical significance and its predictions are very reliable.

5 0
2 months ago
Suppose you own 75 shares of Google, which pay a dividend of $0.13 per share per year. How much will you receive in dividends ov
Free_Kalibri [3773]
Calculate 0.13 multiplied by 75: $9.75.
Now, multiply that result by 5: $48.75.
7 0
1 month ago
Read 2 more answers
Carlos is risk-neutral and has an ancient farmhouse with great character for sale in Slaterville Springs. His reservation price
Free_Kalibri [3773]

Answer:

The question lacks completeness; the following addition would enhance it:

"If Realtors require a 5 percent commission on the sale price and every Realtor faces opportunity costs of $2,000 to negotiate a sale, will Carlos opt to hire a Realtor? If he does, how will the overall economic surplus change?"

The result is that the total economic surplus rose from $20,000 to $248,000.

Explanation:

It is essential to grasp the concepts of marginal cost, marginal benefit, and asymmetric information. Marginal cost refers to the additional cost incurred from utilizing one more unit of a resource, while marginal benefit signifies the advantage gained from that investment. Asymmetric information arises when one side in a transaction possesses more information than the other.

Carlos's reservation price stands at $130,000. He intends to sell for $140,000 to Whitney, whose reservation price is $150,000. Thus, Carlos enjoys a surplus of 140,000 - 130,000 = $10,000, and Whitney has a surplus of 150,000 - 140,000 = $10,000. Consequently, the total economic surplus amounts to $20,000.

Should Carlos enlist a realtor, who charges 5% if the property is sold for $300,000 to someone with a reservation price of $350,000, the surplus would be calculated as:

5% × 300,000 - 2000 = $13,000.

Here, the surplus equals 300,000 - 130,000 + 15,000 = $185,000.

Hence, the buyer's surplus is:

350,000 - 300,000 = $50,000.

Thus, the total economic surplus has increased from $20,000 to $248,000.

5 0
1 month ago
Other questions:
  • Greenwood Company manufactures two products—14,000 units of Product Y and 6,000 units of Product Z. The company uses a plantwide
    8·1 answer
  • When the price of erasers increases from $1.50 to $2.50, the quantity demanded of pencils is unchanged. The cross-price elastici
    14·1 answer
  • IKEA is very Sweden-centric; that is, they like doing it the Swedish way, from the names of the furniture to the management of t
    7·1 answer
  • One of the most challenging tasks for any firm, including In Fine Fettle, is determining how much to spend on promotion. Four ba
    9·1 answer
  • 10 percent partner in a partnership that incurred a $4 million business loss this year. Jahlil has no other business activities.
    15·1 answer
  • A colleague from the plant in Germany has arrived at the Chicago plant to share insights on a recent product line changeover imp
    7·1 answer
  • Ashley received a raise at work that increased her monthly income from $1,000 to $1,250. Last year, Ashley bought 20 slices of c
    12·1 answer
  • Winifred read the newspaper early in the morning before she opened her Chinese imports store for the day. She read an article ab
    13·1 answer
  • The net profit margin ratio can mathematically be broken down as:______.
    12·1 answer
  • Continuing with the company selected in Unit 2, think about the types of financial data that would be included and excluded in d
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!