Answer:
The upper limit for the height of the prism is 
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
x------> represent the height of the prism
It is known that
the area of the base of the prism must not exceed


thus
-------> inequality A
------> equation B
-----> equation C
Insert equation B into equation C

------> equation D
Substituting equations B and D into inequality A
-------> using a graphing tool to solve the inequality
The resultant solution for x lies in the interval---------->![[0,12]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B0%2C12%5D)
consult the attached figure
but bear in mind that
The width of the base must be
meters shorter than the height of the prism
thus
the solution for x is confined to the interval ------> ![(9,12]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%289%2C12%5D)
The maximum height of the prism equals 
The average temperature for July over the past 30 years in Eloy and Arizona is 90°. The standard deviation is 2.1°. This implies that the temperature over these 30 years spans from 90° - 2.1° to 90° + 2.1°, which equals 87.9° to 90°. The average for the last five summers in Eloy and Arizona is 92°. To calculate the reduction, which is 2.5% from 92, we find that 89.70° is within the 87.9° to 90° range. Thus, it can be concluded that the two averages are likely identical.
Observe the squares... 13 is attainable owing to it being expressible as the sum of two squares (integers) 9 + 4.. utilize (0,3) and (2,0)... derive the square roots and assign them to different coordinate axes... for a more straightforward value. However, no such representation exists for 15... There is a representation available for 18... 18 = 3^2 + 3^2... try (0,3), (3,0), (3,6), (6,3).