For this query, the time presented seems unclear to me. I understand that the rate of return is determined by total return over the investment. Assuming Matt received $400 as dividends without reinvesting them into additional shares, his total return across two years amounted to $500. Conversely, if the dividends were reinvested into the stock—something that typically happens with a 401(k) or IRA—his ROI would render a mere 6% due to only a $100 gain on a $1500 investment. In an actual market scenario, it’s likely that Matt would have experienced about a 5% return on a solid stock, while Bella would have had approximately 0.05% from a savings account.
I hope this was helpful!;)
Each month she puts in 20......therefore annually she deposits (20 * 12) = 240 y = 240x + 200
Answer:

Upon solving for y, we find:


By substitution, we have:

Thus, we arrive at:

And for x, we determine:

This gives us a length of 76 and a width of 12.5.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are dealing with a rectangle. The formula for the perimeter is:

Here, x denotes the length and y the width. The following conditions can be established:

Substituting these values yields:

When we solve for y, we find:


By substitution, we obtain:

Thus, we conclude:

The length is found to be 76, while the width measures 12.5.
Part 1) side 1=15'-7" side 2=20'-4" side 3=26'-2" To determine the total length of all three sides, add them together: total length=side 1+side 2 +side 3. By substituting, total length=15'-7"+20'-4"+26'-2" can be expressed as total length=(15'+20'+26')+(7"+4"+2"). This simplifies to total length=(61')+(13"). Keep in mind that 12"=1', so 13" can be expressed as 12"+1"=1'+1". By substituting again: total length=(61')+(1'+1") simplifies to total length=(62')+(1") which leads to 62'-1". Therefore, the total length of the three sides is 62'-1".
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of cans collected by Shane be x.
Thus, the number of cans collected by Abha is x + 178.
Given that a minimum of 2000 cans is required to be collected.
Therefore, we have the inequality,[ [TAG_19]]
Total cans by Shane + Total cans by Abha ≥ 2000.
That is, 
Thus, the necessary inequality is
.