Anya graphed the line (y−2)=3(x−1) on the coordinate grid. A coordinate plane with a line passing through the points, (negative

Rounded to the nearest hundred, 2605 becomes 2600. If it had been 2650 or more, it would have rounded to 2700.

You can utilize the Pythagorean theorem expressed as a^2 + b^2 = c^2... if b is unknown, you can rearrange the formula. Hence, c^2 - a^2 = b^2. Squaring 47 gives 2209 and squaring 13 yields 169... Subtracting gives you 2209-169, which results in 2040. Taking the square root of that yields approximately 45.166359, which can be rounded to 45 or as 45.167 when expressed to two decimal places. I hope this helps!:)

Answer:

Here’s the response provided

Step-by-step explanation:

Referring to the flask diagram, the diameter of the cylinder measures 1 inch and its height (h) is 3 inches. Thus, the radius of the cylinder (r) = diameter / 2 = 1/2 = 0.5 inch

The volume of the cylinder can be calculated as πr²h = π(0.5)² × 3 = 2.36 in³

As for the sphere, its diameter is 4.5 in. Hence, the radius of the sphere R = diameter / 2 = 4.5/2 = 2.25 in

The volume of the sphere is calculated as 4/3 (πR³) = 4/3 × π × 2.25³ = 47.71 in³

The total volume of the flask = Volume of the cylinder  + Volume of the sphere = 2.36 + 47.71 = 50.07 in³

<pWhen the cylinder and the sphere are expanded by a scale factor of 2, the height (h') of the cylinder becomes 3/2 = 1.5 inches and the radius (r') becomes 0.5/2 = 0.025 inches.

The new volume for the cylinder = πr'²h' = π(0.25)² × 1.5 = 0.29 in³

For the sphere, the new radius is R' = 2.25 / 2 = 1.125 in.

The new volume of the sphere = 4/3 (πR'³) = 4/3 × π × 1.125³ = 5.96 in³

Thus, the new volume of the flask = The new volume of the cylinder  + The new volume of the sphere = 0.29 + 5.96 = 6.25 in³

<pThe ratio of the new volume to the original volume = New Volume of the flask / Volume of the flask = 6.25 / 50.07 = 1/8 = 0.125<pThe resulting volume will thus be 0.125 times the original volume

There is clear favoritism present. However, it is crucial to examine not just how many women were promoted in comparison to men but also the rate of promotion within each group. In the case of men, 21 out of 24 received promotions, indicating a substantial rate of 87.5%. In contrast, for women, only 14 out of 24 were promoted, which is 58.3%, just over half. Therefore, we can conclude that there is a distinct bias favoring male employees.

the third graph