Answer:
No solution
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: 
and 
Handle each inequality separately.
Utilizing the subtraction property of inequalities
and
Utilizing the addition property of inequalities
Thus, the solution to the combined inequality is the overlap of both solutions.
Refer to the attached image for the number line representation.
No solution
A proportion maintains a consistent ratio m/d
If m = 0.75d, then the m/d ratio translates to (0.75d)/d = 0.75
In this case, the ratio can be expressed as (.75d-2)/d = 0.75 - (2/d).
Thus, it is not proportional.
The effective annual interest rate calculations yield:
i = (1 + 0.064/12)^12 - 1 = 0.066
For year 1: the interest amounts to $613.80 (calculating $9300 multiplied by 0.066)
For year 2: the interest totals $654.31 (adding year 1’s interest to $9300 and multiplying by 0.066)
For year 3: the interest is $656.98 (following the same process as year 2)
For year 4: the interest is $657.16
The cumulative interest totals: $2582.25
The present value of this sum is:
P = 2582.23 / (1 + 0.066)^4 = $1999.72
Thus, the final answer is $1999.72.
No, mixed numbers must include both a whole number and a fraction to qualify as such. If a fraction were present, it wouldn’t sum to two due to the presence of the 1's ❤️.
Answer:
The term 6x should actually be 6x²
Step-by-step-explanation:
The illustration referenced, which depicts the multiplication of the trinomial with the binomial, is provided in the image below.
To identify where Chin's multiplication went wrong and to establish the correct expression, we'll analyze each multiplication performed. Therefore, we have:
3x*x² = 3x³
3x*2x = 6x² (the mistake occurred here, as Chin recorded it as 6x in the chart)
3x*4 = 12x
2*x²=2x²
2*2x = 4x
2*4 = 8
Thus, the term 6x should indeed be corrected to 6x²
