answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nirvana33
2 months ago
6

A pitfall cited in Section 1.10 is expecting to improve the overall performance of a computer by improving only one aspect of th

e computer. Consider a computer running a program that requires 250 s, with 70 s spent executing FP instructions, 85 s executed L/S instructions and 40 s spent executing branch instructions
(5 min, sec 1.10)By how much is the total time reduced if the time for FP operations is reduced by 20%?


(5 min, sec 1.10) By how much is the time for INT operations reduced if the total time is reduced by 20%?
(5 min, sec 1.10) Can the total time be reduced by 20% by reducing only the time for branch instructions?
Engineering
1 answer:
alex41 [359]2 months ago
8 0

Answer:

a) In this scenario, the time required for the FP operation would decrease by 20%, which means it would now take 80% of the original duration.

(1-0.2)*70 s =56s

The reduction in this case is 70-56 s=14s

And the new total time would be calculated as 250-14=236 s

b) Here, the overall time is reduced by 20%, indicating that the updated total time would amount to 0.8 times the original total time (1-0.2) *250s =200 s

The initial duration for INT operations can be determined as:

250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}

t_{INT}=55s

For this segment, it is assumed that the INT operations time is the only one adjusted:

200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}

And subsequently: \Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s

c) A decrease in overall time suggests the new total would stand at 205 s based on preceding calculations. Timing for FP is now 70 s, for L/S is 85 s, and for INT operations is 55 s. Thus, summing them gives 70+85+55=210 s, indicating that reducing branch instruction times alone cannot lead to a 20% reduction in overall time.

Explanation:

The information shows that a program on a computer is run for 250 s, with 70 s allocated to FP instructions, 85 s for L/S instructions, and 40 s for branch instructions.

Part 1

In this scenario, the required FP operation time diminishes by 20%, indicating it would occupy 80% of the original time.

(1-0.2)*70 s =56s

The reduction in this instance equates to 70-56 s=14s

And the new total time is given by 250-14=236 s

Part 2

<pfor this="" case="" we="" denote="" the="" total="" time="" reduction="" at="" which="" correlates="" to="" a="" new="" of="" times="" original="" cumulative="" src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%281-0.2%29%20%2A250s%20%3D200%20s" id="TexFormula12" title=" (1-0.2) *250s =200 s" alt=" (1-0.2) *250s =200 s" align="absmiddle" class="latex-formula">

The original INT operations timing is detailed as:

250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}

t_{INT}=55s

In this context, we assume the modification pertains solely to INT operations:

200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}

And following that: \Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s

Moreover, we can quantify the decline using the proportional change:

\% Change = \frac{5s}{55 s} *100 = 9.09\% in reduction.

Part 3

<pthe decrease="" in="" total="" time="" signifies="" it="" would="" be="" s="" derived="" from="" the="" above="" calculations.="" given="" times="" of="" for="" fp="" l="" and="" int="" operations="" results="" illustrating="" that="" merely="" reducing="" branch="" instruction="" will="" not="" enable="" a="" cut="" time.=""> </pthe></pfor>
You might be interested in
Compute the sum with carry-wraparound (sometimes called the one's complement sum) of the following two numbers. Give answer in 8
grin007 [323]

Response:

00100111

Explanation:

We have been given;

10010110

10010000

Add them following standard binary addition rules

10010110

10010000

-------------

(1)00100110

-------------

ignore the leading (1) because it is a carry.

Increase the result by 1 to achieve a 1's complement sum

00100110 + 1 = 00100111

Final Result: 00100111

3 0
2 months ago
A jar made of 3/16-inch-thick glass has an inside radius of 3.00 inches and a total height of 6.00 inches (including the bottom
mote1985 [299]

Response:

1. To find the volume of the glass shell (Vg), simply subtract the volume of the empty part of the jar (Ve) from the total volume of the jar (Vj):

Vg = Vj - Ve

Volume can be calculated by multiplying the base (B) with the height (h). The base of the jar is a circle, thus its area is πr^2 (where r indicates the radius).

The radius differs based on the jar's section: the inner radius for the empty part is d = 3 in, while for the total jar it includes the glass thickness a = 3 + 3/16 = 3.1875 in.

The height of the entire jar is given as h = 6 in, whereas for the empty portion, it's the total height minus the thickness of the glass h' = 6 - 0.1875 = 5.8125 in.

Now we can perform the calculations:

Vj = πa^2 • h = 191.42 in^3

Ve = πd^2 • h' = 164.26 in^3

Thus, the volume of the glass shell equals Vj - Ve, resulting in 27.16 in^3.

2. The mass of the glass jar can be determined by multiplying the density of the glass with the volume:

m = ρ • Vg

The glass density is provided in cubic feet, so we first convert it to cubic inches by dividing by 1728:

ρ = 165 lb/ft^3 / 1728 = 0.095 lb/in^3

<ptherefore the="" mass="" of="" jar="" is:="">

m = 0.095 lb/in^3 • 27.16 in^3 = 2.59 lb

5. To calculate the weight and volume of the displaced water, we first need to ascertain how deep the jar sinks (H), as the volume of displaced water equals the submerged volume of the jar. The jar will descend until the gravitational force downwards equals the buoyancy force upwards. The displaced water volume is πa^2 • H, and the buoyancy is calculated as ρw • g • Vd (where ρw is the density of water, defined as 62.5 lb/ft^3 / 1728 = 0.036 lb/in^3, and Vd is the displaced water volume).

Thus, the buoyancy can be represented as:

B = ρw • g • πa^2 • H

Setting buoyancy equal to gravity:

B = m • g (where m is the mass of the jar). Therefore, we have:

ρw • g • πa^2 • H = m • g

From this, simplifying gives:

ρw • πa^2 • H = m

We can derive H:

H = m / (ρw • πa^2)

H = 2.25 inches

This indicates the jar will sink 2.25 inches into the water.

3. Calculating the volume of displaced water is straightforward. It matches the volume of the submerged jar:

Vd = πa^2 • H

Vd = 71.94 in^3

4. Lastly, to determine the weight of the displaced water:

m = ρw • Vd

m = 0.036 lb/in^3 • 71.94 in^3

m = 2.59 lb

As evident, the mass of the jar aligns with the mass of the displaced water. Following this logic could have simplified our calculations, but I chose to elaborate for clarity.

</ptherefore>
6 0
2 months ago
I2 + KOH = KIO3 + KI + H2O Marque la(s) respuesta(s) falsas: La suma de coeficientes mínimos del agua y el agente reductor es 6
Daniel [329]
The incorrect statements include: - KOH is the reducing agent. - The total of transferred electrons alongside the minimum water coefficient rounds to 16. All other claims stand accurate. The false assertions point out that KOH does not function as the reducing agent, and the total of electrons and the water coefficient indeed equates to 13, rather than the stated 16.
8 0
2 months ago
Plutonium isotopes undergo decay, producing heat. Plutonium isotope 239 (Pu-239) has 1.9 watts per kilogram [W/kg] of decay heat
Daniel [329]
The result is 1495.81 calories, which rounds to 1500 calories at 2 significant figures.

Explanation: For each kilogram of Pu-239 decaying, there is a decay heat release of 1.9 Watts. To find the heat released by 1.25 moles of Pu-239 over a duration of 3 hours (in calories): First, we find the mass of Pu-239 in 1.25 moles. The molar mass of Pu-239 is 244 g/mol or 0.244 kg/mol. Thus, 1.25 moles = 1.25 × 0.244 = 0.305 kg. Each kilogram yields 1.9 Watts, hence: 0.305 kg of Pu-239 results in (0.305 × 1.9) Watts; approximately 0.5795 Watts. Note that Watts equate to J/s. Using the relation Power = Energy/time, we have Energy = power × time. Knowing: Power = 0.5795 Watts, Time = 3 hours = 10800 seconds, we calculate: Energy = 0.5795 × 10800 = 6258.6 J. Finally, converting to calories: 6258.6 J equals 1495.81 calories when multiplied by 0.239, thus reaching the total of approximately 1495.81 calories.

7 0
1 month ago
Other questions:
  • A. Calculate the fraction of atom sites that are vacant for lead at its melting temperature of 327°C (600 K). Assume an energy f
    5·1 answer
  • 1. You do not need to remove the lead weights inside tires before recycling them.
    8·1 answer
  • . Were you able to observe ???? = 0 in the circuit you constructed during lab? Why or why not? Hint: What value of resistance wo
    6·1 answer
  • A long, circular aluminum rod is attached at one end to a heated wall and transfers heat by convection to a cold fluid.
    12·1 answer
  • The most flexible and mobile method of supplying our need for mechanical energy has been the internal-__________ engine. (10 let
    9·2 answers
  • NEEDS TO BE IN PYTHON:ISBN-13 is a new standard for indentifying books. It uses 13 digits d1d2d3d4d5d6d7d8d910d11d12d13 . The la
    15·1 answer
  • Let Deterministic Quicksort be the non-randomized Quicksort which takes the first element as a pivot, using the partition routin
    13·1 answer
  • A thin-walled tube with a diameter of 6 mm and length of 20 m is used to carry exhaust gas from a smoke stack to the laboratory
    7·1 answer
  • A tank contains 500 kg of a liquid whose specific gravity is 2. Determine the volume of the liquid in the tank.
    12·1 answer
  • Arnold has a contract to design a hospital. Which factors should he incorporate into the design of the building?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!