Which statements describe the graph of y = Negative RootIndex 3 StartRoot x minus 1 EndRoot + 2? Select three options.

Greetings,

f(1)=160
f(2)=160*(-2)
f(3)=160*(-2)²
f(4)=160*(-2)^3=-1280

The function can be expressed as f(n)=160*(-2)^(n-1)

We recognize that two angles, ∠UVW and ∠XYZ, are complementary, which means their sum is 90°.

Their measures are given as:

∠UVW = x - 10

∠XYZ = 4x - 10

Adding these, we have:

(x - 10) + (4x - 10) = 90

Simplifying:

5x - 20 = 90

Adding 20 to both sides:

5x = 110

Dividing by 5:

x = 22

Substituting back:

∠UVW = 22 - 10 = 12°

∠XYZ = 4(22) - 10 = 78°

Therefore, the values are:

x = 22°

∠UVW = 12°

∠XYZ = 78°

Answer:

• Yes; refer to the question's clarification and the detailed answer below for more information.

Explanation:

Sets are in bijection if there is a bijective function connecting them.

This implies that the question can be interpreted as: can sets A and B be related via a bijective function?

A bijective function must be both injective and surjective, which means it is reversible.

Injective indicates that each element in the domain corresponds uniquely to an element in the codomain.

Surjective denotes that every element in the codomain relates to exactly one element in the domain.

This ensures there are no unmatched elements.

If we consider set A as the function's domain and set B as the codomain.

The core question then becomes: can the set {17, 34, 51, 68, 85,...} be in bijection with the set {11, 22, 33, 44, 55,...}?

Notice that the two sets share no common elements, as 17 and 34 are coprime.

A bijective function can only be established between sets A and B or B and A if both sets possess the same cardinality (number of elements).

Indeed, the cardinality of sets A and B is identical: both sets are of equal size, affirming that a bijective relationship exists between them.

<span>To isolate p, start by subtracting B from both sides: SA-B=1/2lp. Next, multiply both sides by 2 to eliminate the 1/2: 2SA=lp. Finally, divide both sides by l to derive p: (2SA)/l=p.</span>

Answer: OPTION C.

Step-by-step explanation:

It is essential to consider the following:

Dilation:

• A transformation where the image retains the same shape as the original but differs in size.

• Dilation maintains the order of points.

•  Measurements of angles remain unchanged.

Translation:

• A transformation that keeps the image identical in size and shape to the original.

• Translation preserves the ordering of points.

• The angle measurements do not change.

Consequently, since Square T underwent translation followed by dilation to form Square T'', we conclude that the rationale explaining why they are similar is:

Translations and dilations maintain the order of points; thereby, the corresponding sides of squares T and T″ are proportional.