All categories

3 days ago

Identify one disadvantage to each of the following models of electron configuration:

Chemistry

2 answers:

lions [985]3 days ago

6 0

Answer:

Below are the downsides of each electron configuration model:

1). Dot Structures - They consume more space and fail to convey the electron distribution within orbitals.

2). Arrow and line diagrams complicate electron counting and also take up excessive space.

3). Written Configurations do not illustrate electron distribution in orbitals, leading to possible errors in counting electrons.

alisha [964]3 days ago

5 0

Advantages:

-Dot structures simplify electron counting and indicate how many electrons reside in each electron shell.

-Arrow and line diagrams represent electron spin and include every orbital.

-Written configurations take up little space and effectively display electron distribution across subshells.

You might be interested in

Consider the following system at equilibrium:

VMariaS [1037]

Answer:

A - Increase (R), Decrease (P), Decrease(q), Triple both (Q) and (R)

B - Increase(P), Increase(q), Decrease (R)

C - Triple (P) and cut (q) down to a third

Explanation:

According to the principle of Le Chatelier, when a system reaches equilibrium and a change is introduced, the system will respond to counteract that change.

Since P and Q are reactants, raising the amount of either one or both without a proportional rise in R (which is a product) will cause the equilibrium to move towards the right. Similarly, if R decreases while P and Q remain constant, this too will push the equilibrium to the right. Thus, Increase(P), Increase(q), and Decrease(R) will lead to a rightward shift in the equilibrium.

Conversely, raising R without increasing P and Q will draw the equilibrium to the left. Likewise, cutting down P and/or Q without a similar reduction in R will shift the equilibrium leftward. Therefore, Increase(R), Decrease(P), Decrease(q), and triple both (Q) and (R) will shift the equilibrium to the left.

If there are equivalent changes in P and Q, with R remaining unchanged, then the equilibrium remains stationary. So, tripling (P) while reducing (q) to one third will not alter the equilibrium.

6 0

3 days ago

How many protons neutrons and electrons are there in a neutral atom of 43k (potassium-43)?

castortr0y [923]

Answer:

Protons: 19

Neutrons: 25

Electrons: 19

Explanation:

Protons:

The atomic number determines the number of protons in an atom. Consequently, with Potassium's atomic number being 19, it contains 19 protons.

Neutrons:

The formula to find neutrons is:

# of Neutrons = Atomic Mass - # of Protons

Given:

Atomic Mass = 43

# of Protons = 19

Thus,

# of Neutrons = 43 - 19

# of Neutrons = 24

Electrons:

In a neutral atom, the quantity of electrons matches that of protons. Therefore, a neutral Potassium atom with 19 protons must equally have 19 electrons.

3 0

17 hours ago

You want to prepare a solution with a concentration of 200.0μM from a stock solution with a concentration of 500.0mM. At your di

lorasvet [956]

Answer:

1) This dilution plan will yield a 200μM solution.

2) This dilution plan will not yield a 200μM solution.

3) This dilution plan will not yield a 200μM solution.

4) This dilution plan will yield a 200μM solution.

5) This dilution plan will yield a 200μM solution.

Explanation:

Convert the initial molarity into molar form as shown.

$500mM = 500mM \times (\frac{1M}{1000M})= 0.5M$

Let's examine the following serial dilution processes.

Dilute 5.00 mL of the stock solution to 500 mL. Then take 10.00 mL of this new solution and dilute it further to 250 mL.

Concentration of 500 mL solution:

$M_{2}= \frac{M_{1}V_{1}}{V_{2}}= \frac{(0.5M)(5.00mL)}{500 mL}= 5 \times 10^{-3}M$

10 mL of this solution is further diluted to 250 mL

$M_{final}= \frac{M_{2}V_{2}}{V_{final}}= \frac{(5 \times 10^{-3}M)(10.0mL)}{250 mL}= 2 \times 10^{-4}M$

Convert μM:

$2 \times 10^{-4}M = (2 \times 10^{-4}M)(\frac{1 \mu M}{10^{-6}M})= 200 \mu M$

Thus, this dilution scheme will yield a 200μM solution.

Dilute 5.00 mL of the stock solution to 100 mL. Then take 10.00 mL of this new solution and dilute to 1000 mL.

Concentration of 100 mL solution:

$M_{2}= \frac{M_{1}V_{1}}{V_{2}}= \frac{(0.5M)(5.00mL)}{100 mL}= 2.5 \times 10^{-2}M$

10 mL of this solution is further diluted to 1000 mL

$M_{final}= \frac{M_{2}V_{2}}{V_{final}}= \frac{(2.5 \times 10^{-2}M)(10.0mL)}{1000 mL}= 2.5 \times 10^{-4}M$

Convert μM:

$2.5 \times 10^{-4}M = (2.5 \times 10^{-4}M)(\frac{1 \mu M}{10^{-6}M})= 250 \mu M$

Thus, this dilution scheme will not yield a 200μM solution.

Dilute 10.00 mL of the stock solution to 100 mL, followed by diluting 5 mL of that new solution to 100 mL.

Concentration of 100 mL solution:

$M_{2}= \frac{M_{1}V_{1}}{V_{2}}= \frac{(0.5M)(10mL)}{100 mL}= 0.05M$

5 mL of this solution is diluted to 1000 mL

$M_{final}= \frac{M_{2}V_{2}}{V_{final}}= \frac{(0.05M)(5mL)}{1000 mL}= 0.25 \times 10^{-4}M$

Convert μM:

$0.25 \times 10^{-4}M = (0.25 \times 10^{-4}M)(\frac{1 \mu M}{10^{-6}M})= 25 \mu M$

Thus, this dilution scheme will not yield a 200μM solution.

Dilute 5 mL of the stock solution to 250 mL. Then take 10 mL of this new solution and further dilute it to 500 mL.

Concentration of 250 mL solution:

$M_{2}= \frac{M_{1}V_{1}}{V_{2}}= \frac{(0.5M)(5mL)}{250 mL}= 0.01M$

10 mL of this solution is further diluted to 500 mL

$M_{final}= \frac{M_{2}V_{2}}{V_{final}}= \frac{(0.01M)(10mL)}{500 mL}= 2 \times 10^{-4}M$

Convert μM:

$2 \times 10^{-4}M = (2 \times 10^{-4}M)(\frac{1 \mu M}{10^{-6}M})= 200 \mu M$

Thus, this dilution scheme will yield a 200μM solution.

Dilute 10 mL of the stock solution to 250 mL. Then take another 10 mL of this new solution and dilute it to 1000 mL.

Concentration of 250 mL solution:

$M_{2}= \frac{M_{1}V_{1}}{V_{2}}= \frac{(0.5M)(10mL)}{250 mL}= 0.02M$

10 mL of this solution is further diluted to 1000 mL

$M_{final}= \frac{M_{2}V_{2}}{V_{final}}= \frac{(0.02M)(10mL)}{1000 mL}= 2 \times 10^{-4}M$

Convert μM:

$2 \times 10^{-4}M = (2 \times 10^{-4}M)(\frac{1 \mu M}{10^{-6}M})= 200 \mu M$

Thus, this dilution scheme will yield a 200μM solution.

7 0

9 days ago

In a car piston shown above, the pressure of the compressed gas (red) is 5.00 atm. If the area of the piston is 0.0760 m^2. What

Anarel [852]

Answer:

The force is 38503.5N.

Explanation:

From the problem, we determine:

P (pressure) = 5.00 atm.

Next, to find the force in Newtons (N), we must convert 5 atm into N/m², as shown:

1 atm equals 101325 N/m².

So, 5 atm equals 5 x 101325 = 506625 N/m².

A (the piston area) = 0.0760 m².

Pressure signifies force per unit area, mathematically represented as

P = F/A.

From this, we find F = P × A.

F = 506625 × 0.0760.

Therefore, F = 38503.5N.

Thus, the piston experiences a force of 38503.5N.

6 0

13 days ago

A 0.0200 M NaCl solution was formed when 38.0 grams of NaCl was dissolved in enough water. What was the total volume of the solu

Tems11 [846]

Start by determining the number of moles, which is obtained by dividing 38 grams by the molar mass of 58.43 g/mol. This calculation yields 0.65 moles. The concentration is calculated by dividing the number of moles by the volume in liters. Using this formula, we can derive the total volume by dividing the number of moles by the concentration. Thus, 0.65 moles divided by 0.02M (mol/L) results in a total volume of 32.5 L.

4 0

3 days ago

Read 2 more answers