Part B

Answer:

2.1%

Step-by-step explanation:

The compound interest formula can be expressed as:

Starting with a Principal amount of $6000 and applying an interest rate of 1.5% for the first two years:

We calculate compound interest for one year at rate i, resulting in $6311.16:

Thus, the interest rate for the third year is 2.1%

Create a visual representation to depict the situation outlined below.

Let h signify the height of the tree.

Since ΔABC is similar to ΔADE, it follows that
DE/BC = AD/AB

This means that
h/1.94 = (5.1 + 10.2)/5.1 = 3
Consequently, h = 1.94*3 = 5.82 m

Final result: 5.82 m

Rounded to the nearest hundred, 2605 becomes 2600. If it had been 2650 or more, it would have rounded to 2700.

Answer:

a) Null hypothesis:

Alternative hypothesis:

b)

Given that the p-value is lower than the significance threshold in this situation, we have sufficient grounds to reject the null hypothesis.

c)

In this case, since the p-value exceeds the significance threshold, we have adequate evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.

d)

Here again, with the p-value being less than the significance level, we can reject the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Provided data and references

represents the average of the samples

denotes the standard deviation of the samples

indicates the number of samples

is the value we are examining

defines the significance level for the test.

t represents the specific statistic of interest

indicates the p-value relevant to the test (the variable of concern)

Define the null and alternative hypotheses.

To assess if the true mean is at least 10 hours, we must set up a hypothesis:

Part a

Null hypothesis:

Alternative hypothesis:

If we consider the sample size being less than 30 and the population deviation unknown, it’s more appropriate to use a t-test to compare the actual mean with the reference value, calculated as:

(1)

Part b

In this scenario t=-2.3,

Initially, we need to calculate the degrees of freedom

Since this is a left-tailed test, the p-value is determined by:

In this instance, with the p-value being less than the significance level, we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Part c

For this situation t=-1.8,

We need to find the degrees of freedom

For the left-tailed test, the p-value is given by:

In this case, since the p-value is above the significance level, we have enough grounds to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.

Part d

For this case t=-3.6,

Firstly, we find the degrees of freedom

Since we are conducting a left-tailed test, the p-value is calculated as:

Here, with the p-value being lower than the significance threshold, we can reject the null hypothesis.

Answer:

The function decreases across all real numbers x where x < 1.5.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have

This represents an upward-opening vertical parabola

The vertex denotes a minimum point

The vertex is located at (1.5,-6.25)

We know that

The function is decreasing within the interval ----> (-∞, 1.5) x < 1.5

This means----> the function is continuously decreasing for all real x values under 1.5

Conversely, the function is increasing within the interval ----> (1.5, ∞) x> 1.5

Thus, for all real x values greater than 1.5, the function is increasing

Check the attached figure for further clarification

Therefore

The true statement is

The function decreases across all real numbers x where x < 1.5.